Rorschach Thinking

You know those funny blobs you first encountered in high school, weird black on white blotches which you were asked to label. “I think that looks like a crow,” you might say, while your best friend would reply, “Don’t be silly, it looks exactly like Abraham Lincoln!”

Hermann Rorschach didn’t likely invent the notion of associating inkblots with personality or ideas, but he was the first to formalize the discipline which is still taught and used, although not without some controversy.

What is without doubt is that all of us, all the time, see the exact same thing and interpret it in entirely different ways. Sometimes diametrically opposed. Particularly in the last eight years or so, with the advent of “alternative truth”, even the tangible and the generally obvious is now fair game for calling it whatever you like. “Jewish Space Lasers” exist in reality, and in fact, at least in the minds of some. Maybe Santa Claus and the Easter Bunny really exist.

Paul Simon said it well in the Simon and Garfunkel tune The Boxer: “Still a man hears what he wants to hear and disregards the rest.” We hear what we want to hear, we see what we want to see.

This has implications for us both on the intake and the output side.

To avoid having our heads full of too much bogus information, we need to develop BS filters. The civil legal test, “a balance of probabilities” is a good place to start, with the criminal legal test of “beyond a reasonable doubt” applied to critical stuff. If you don’t want to think like a lawyer, well, think like the engineer who designs the bridge to which you will entrust your life. A little skepticism and double-checking will go a long way.

On the output side, we always have to keep in mind that what the hearer hears is not necessarily what you thought you were saying. This is why good teachers will present things in several different ways, audibly, visually, with words, with examples, and in the best of all worlds, with hands-on opportunities for the students to actually work with the new concepts.

This is why it’s so important that we read and re-read messages before we hit “send”, ensuring that our messages are clear and obvious. When you’re speaking from the platform, this is why you need to be watching those faces and those eyes so very carefully. Even one puzzled look or troubled expression is an important cue that you need to slow down and recalculate. Before letters and papers are sent out, another set of eyes will go a long way to ensuring your message is received as intended.

At least, that’s how I see it!

Similar Posts

  • On War

    We are universally horrified by the atrocity of war in Ukraine. As we should be. But we should be neither surprised nor complacent. War and its attendant atrocities are as old as our species, in fact, older. Savagery by one group of primates against another is well documented. Birds, and even insects, carry out massive…

  • Taking Stock

    As 2021 winds down, we naturally turn to the new year, wondering what it may hold for us. But the more important question is, “What do we hold for the new year?” Because the truth is that to a very large extent, the new year will give us what we give it. Sure, stuff will…

  • Old Friends

    Just a little while ago I spent a precious afternoon with an old friend, a friend from so far back that he knows stuff about me that nobody else knows, stuff I’d just as soon he kept to himself. You understand – you were young and foolish, once. Decades ago our ways parted geographically and…

  • Never a Vacuum

    It’s said, quite correctly, that nature abhors a vacuum. If you create a gap, something will rush in to fill it. This is most true in our lives, personally and professionally, and explains why those who live with purpose tend to be happier and more successful than those who stumble from one random happenstance to…

  • Two Leaders, Two Books

    I’m currently working through Mark Carney’s book Value(s), and I’ll confess it’s a tough read. Takes me back to postgrad economics classes, almost that kind of textbook reading. Interesting and valid, but not Tom Clancy, either. You really have to read, stop, contemplate, then move forward. Carney lays a careful bedrock of the history of…