Self Jokes

Self-deprecating humor is a wonderful piece in the toolkit of any communicator. It can oil the gears in networking and win over an audience for the platform speaker. In general, it’s a powerful device for engagement.

But yet.

Self-deprecating humor, like any other tool, can cause more harm than good and should always be used judiciously. There are a number of reasons for this.

Some years ago I used lawyer jokes quite liberally in my writing and presentations, and was mostly met with laughs and acceptance. I figured that as a lawyer I was entitled to do so. But a colleague challenged me: “Are lawyer jokes any different than Newfie jokes or Jewish jokes or Italian jokes? Don’t they rely on unfair stereotypes and don’t they feed disrespect for a group?”

Well, he was right. Seen in that light, there wasn’t much of a defense. I’m not going to say I no longer tell lawyer jokes, but the few that remain pass a high standard where it’s all about clever use of words and not at all about “taking a shot”.

Self-jokes are of a kind with self-slurs. You know the sterotype where young black men call each other “the N word” and young Italian-Canadians joke about each other as “Wops”. Cute, or playing with fire? Can you demand respect from outsiders if you don’t show it with insiders?

I recently heard a dynamic keynote in which the young female speaker challenged us to break the ubiquitous “Hey, guys!” habit, which we use even when talking to a mixed audience, sometimes even an all-female audience. She spoke from the heart about her battle for gender-respect and individuality in the male-dominated world of engineering. (Her Ted Talk is here (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nJRO6QVzYRE) .)

Being respectful about our pronouns is one thing, but seeing the larger picture of killing respectfulness by a thousand cuts is another. Like most important things it begins at the micro level, just having an awareness that the words of our mouths can build and encourage, but they can also tear down and destroy.

Similar Posts

  • Wrecking Square Pegs

    Paul Collins, writing about autists, says “Autists are the ultimate square pegs, and the problem with pounding a square peg into a round hole is not that the hammering is hard work. It’s that you’re destroying the peg.” Collins’ dictum brought me up short, not because I’ve had that much experience with the autistic, but…

  • Mutual Duplicity

    International mutual duplicity is nothing new. On August 24, 1939, Vyacheslav Mikhailovich Molotov for the Soviet Union and Joachim von Ribbentrop for Nazi Germany signed the Treaty of Non-Aggression between Germany and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, generally known as the Molotov-Ribbentrop Agreement. By it, Russia and Germany not only agreed not to attack…

  • The Queen’s Last Words

    Sarah Ferguson, “Fergie”, the Duchess of York, was especially close to Queen Elizabeth II, even after and notwithstanding the divorce from Prince Andrew. Her mother and Queen Elizabeth had been lifelong friends and Elizabeth had known Sarah her entire life and in many ways treated her more like a daughter than daughter-in-law. Sarah put it…

  • Tea Leaves

    Last week we looked at constitutional interpretation. Today we look at tea leaf interpretation in general. Not as popular as it used to be, tea leaf reading was a hit at country fairs and amongst those who were into crystal balls, ouija boards, and the like. The idea was to make a cup of tea…