Secret Maps and the American Border

In the early days after the American Revolution, the boundaries between the new republic and the Loyalist British Colonies (which were to become Canada) were imprecise, at best. In particular, the boundaries between New Brunswick and Maine, and the border between Lower Canada (Quebec) and Maine were uncertain and disputed. The land in dispute was mostly uncharted wilderness.

Lumbermen and settlers were pushing into the disputed territories, and local militias were raised on both sides to chase out the interlopers. The situation could quickly escalate, and neither side had the capacity or the will to fight a war over what seemed like small potatoes.

So, long story short, the two governments agreed to resolve the dispute by discussion and treaty. The Americans appointed Daniel Webster, and the British appointed Lord Ashburton. By all accounts, both were fair and vigorous negotiators, and ultimately arrived at a settlement which more or less split the difference, with the Americans getting slightly more territory, but Canada getting a better strategic boundary.

To everyone’s surprise, the discussions proceeded with little acrimony and with abundant courtesy and apparent reasonableness. Aside from some theatrical grumbling, each government accepted the new boundaries with considerable grace.

Now, you must be wondering why governments settling boundaries would do so with efficiency and cordiality. This isn’t the way things usually happen. So, here’s the truth.

As it happens, the Americans had in their possession apparently authentic maps which more or less showed the righteousness of the British claim. Amazingly (you guessed it) the charts in the possession of the British indicated that the American claim was, by and large, legitimate. So, each side was in possession of pretty clear evidence that their own claim was shaky, and the other guy’s claim was more legitimate than their own.

Who said history was boring?

Similar Posts

  • Expense? Or Investment?

    My friend and speaking colleague Mark Gasparotto, former Canadian army colonel, puts it bluntly: “Leadership training is an investment, not an expense.” Having led troops “outside the wire” in Afghanistan, he knows whereof he speaks. He could not be more correct about leadership training, in fact about any developmental exercise which enhances the value and…

  • It’s Only Words

    “It’s only words And words are all I have To take your heart away.” Barry, Robin, and Maurice Gibb (the “Bee Gees”) 1968 Words are funny things, aren’t they? Words can soothe a child, words can break a heart, words can start a riot, words can steel the soul. Words in the mouth of a…

  • Rules Have a Tone of Voice

    Guest article by Lewis S. Eisen If you run a business that has employees or customers, you actually produce a lot of rules. Whether you call them “policies,” “terms and conditions” or simply “instructions,” essentially they are rules for other people to follow, for example, you might send out instructions for preparation or information explaining…

  • Reigned In

    If I read one more pontification about the need to “reign in” the US Supreme Court or some other out of line demagogues, I’m going to jump off a cliff. No parachute. Not that I disagree with what they’re trying to say, but because they’re relying on spellcheck instead of proofreading. Kings and queens reign,…

  • Wheelbarrows

    The story my Dad told me when I was a little boy had to do with wheelbarrows, but the same parable has been told about donkeys. Doesn’t matter, the point is the same. In any event, there was a man who worked in the factory, back in the day, and every night he would leave…