Dear Little Old Mrs. Vandertramp

All of us who learned French as a second language learned about Mrs. Vandertramp. None of my francophone friends have ever heard of her, and they think it’s the funniest thing they ever heard.
In French, there exists a handful of verbs which are not conjugated in the usual way with avoir, but with être. It just so happens that their first letters, arranged artfully, spell Mrs. Vandertramp. Careful students of French will protest that a few verbs get left out, but you can’t let reality get in the way of a good mnemonic. Careful students of French will also point out that the rule only applies to the person, not to things, and that they are almost adjectival in their operation.
English verbs used to be conjugated in exactly the same way, and one still hears the structure from the mouths of very careful speakers. Shakespeare and the King James Bible use the old form “When Jesus was come down from the mountain” rather than “When Jesus had come down from the mountain”. Same deal– descriptive of a personal change. But in English, that’s all but archaic.
It turns out that learners of English as a second language are faced with arcane and incomprehensible rules, too. Consider the order of adjectives, for example.
Suppose I give you these five words, and ask you to arrange them into a normal English expression: grandmother, Norwegian, old, nice, little.
Almost certainly you said “Nice little old Norwegian grandmother”. So did I. Why? We have no idea, do we? But apparently there is a rule about the order of adjectives, and apparently learners of English as a second language have to sweat it.
It seems that the rule of adjective order is opinion, size, age, shape, colour, origin, material, purpose. Most of us have never heard of it, but all of our anglophone brains agree that’s the order of things.
That’s the funny thing about language– rules are cooked up after the fact to try to explain things, but in reality, our incredibly complex minds simply have a deal amongst themselves about how to exchange ideas in a mutually agreed fashion.
Many years ago, as an anglo struggling to learn French, I spent inordinate amounts of time and effort looking for patterns that would help me determine the gender of French nouns– why is it la tasse, but le bâton? Finally, in exasperation, I implored my professor to show me some pattern or rule. He just roared with laughter. “C’est une question de foi!”– it’s a matter of faith.
And that explains a lot of things about life, doesn’t it?

(If your first language is something other than English, what’s the most puzzling thing for strangers to learn? I’d love to hear.)

Similar Posts

  • M.J.

    Most Ottawa Valley towns have a Carnegie library, and almost everyone knows they’re named after Andrew Carnegie, who endowed such libraries all across North America, and even beyond. But although Pembroke, Renfrew, Arnprior, Almonte and Carleton Place all had O’Brien theatres (only Renfrew remains, I believe), few are aware of the pioneer business magnate who…

  • Rules Have a Tone of Voice

    Guest article by Lewis S. Eisen If you run a business that has employees or customers, you actually produce a lot of rules. Whether you call them “policies,” “terms and conditions” or simply “instructions,” essentially they are rules for other people to follow, for example, you might send out instructions for preparation or information explaining…

  • It Can’t Be Done

    Marshal Ferdinand Jean Marie Foch was, by all accounts, a brilliant and insightful military leader, the Supreme Allied Commander during the last years of World War One. His opinion of airplanes? “They are interesting toys, but of no military value.” Not long before that war, the motorcar had come into vogue, and in many jurisdictions…

  • The God Brokers

    Let’s get one thing straight, right from the outset. Religion is not intrinsically a bad thing. It can be a powerful force for good, provided it’s done right. In the Hebrew Bible, the prophet Micah gives it to us straight. “He hath shewed thee, O man, what is good; and what doth the Lord require…