Read My Mind?

Bynormbowley

Two days before Valentines Day, 1993, Robert Thompson and Jon Venables, both ten years old, played hooky. They went to a shopping mall, found a two year old boy whose mother had taken her eyes off him for just a moment, led him away, tortured him and killed him. Those who remember the story remain horrified by every detail.

What is not as well known is that Thompson and Venables were identified and convicted solely because they were seen on a closed-circuit TV (CCTV) feed, then something of a rarity in England. As a direct result of this becoming known, surveillance cameras went overnight from being a little spooky to being a godsend. Britain quickly became covered with CCTV, and to this day remains in the top ten worldwide in terms of public surveillance (China, USA, UK, Singapore, Australia, Germany, Poland, Brazil, Hong Kong, India, in that order).

On December 2, 2015, husband and wife Syed Rizwan Farook and Tashfeen Malik walked into a Christmas party with high powered weapons and opened fire, killing fourteen and seriously wounding twenty-two others. The FBI later seized their cellphones and tried to hack them. Unable to do so, they requested the help of Apple, and were denied. The day before a court application seeking an order that Apple assist, the FBI announced that a third-party hacker had managed to break into the phones. (What they didn’t announce was that there was nothing of interest to be found, but that’s a different story.)

In early August, 2021, Apple announced that it was rolling out software enabling Apple to analyze images and messages, in real time, on the phone in your pocket, looking for indicators of child abuse and child pornography.

Now, of course, there are no images or messages of this nature on the phone in your pocket, so what’s the worry? As is often said, “Yeah, we’re watching you, but if you’re not doing anything wrong, you’ve got nothing to worry about.”

What’s wrong with a CCTV on every street corner or the big tech companies surveilling your phone and your computer? Well, nothing, so long as you’re not doing anything wrong.

But here’s the problem: who gets to decide the definition of “doing anything wrong”? In many countries, criticism of the ruling party can get you tortured and killed, even if you criticize in private. If you lived in China, Myanmar, or Belarus, would you want the security establishment to have untrammeled access to your computer and your phone? How about if you live in Pakistan, where “blasphemy” remains a capital offence?

Now let’s take the technology a step further. Researchers have now been able to turn brain signals directly into an audible human voice signal. Here’s an example (https://zuckermaninstitute.columbia.edu/sites/default/files/m5_dnn_vocoder.mp3) of a computer reading a subject’s thoughts as they were counting. In this case, a voluntary subject.

Nifty, right? I don’t know about you, but it scares the bejeebers out of me that we stand at the threshold of somebody being able to read my thoughts.

Without doubt we all want to feel safe, and without doubt we all want to see the bad guys caught and punished. But let’s take some time to consider who gets to surveil all of our private thoughts and moments, because in the absence of some limitations within societies purporting to uphold democracy and the rule of law, any and all of us can be “bad guys”.

Similar Posts

  • Gareth

    Bynormbowley

    Jonathan Liew, in the Guardian, January 9, 2023 wrote of the freshly retired Welsh football phenomenon Gareth Bale. Here’s part of what he said. Of course Bale always played to win. But in the 30-yard screamers and lightning bursts of speed, you can spot something else there too: a young man playing for the sake…

  • On War

    Bynormbowley

    We are universally horrified by the atrocity of war in Ukraine. As we should be. But we should be neither surprised nor complacent. War and its attendant atrocities are as old as our species, in fact, older. Savagery by one group of primates against another is well documented. Birds, and even insects, carry out massive…

  • Close

    Bynormbowley

    Our English language may not be the craziest in the world, but it must surely be in the running. Take, for example, the word “close”. If you mean “to shut”, as in “close the door”, the word rhymes with “those”. But if you mean “nearly”, as in “close to home”, the word rhymes with “dose”….

  • A Simple Primer on Constitutional Interpretation

    Bynormbowley

    Herein I try a tightwire act with two strikes against me. First, I have difficulty with brevity. Second, I’m a Canadian-trained lawyer and my understanding of US Constitutional Law is self-taught. So, with those two admissions, here goes. A country’s constitution is its baseline law, and all rights, duties and powers of the state and…

  • The T Solution

    Bynormbowley

    The more critical the decision, the more it should be made for sensible reasons. But unless your decision making process is fairly cleancut and streamlined, you can find yourself in a “paralysis by analysis” doom loop. So what we need is a simple, tried and tested method to help make solid yet efficient decisions. For…