Why Spellcheck is the Enemy of Good Prose

Don’t get me wrong– spellcheck and predictive texting are wonderful inventions and save us all a ton of work. But just as fire can be your best friend, fire and spellcheck can destroy you if you don’t keep them under control.

There are, I think, at least three reasons why “language tech” is treacherous. First, it lures us into turning off our own common sense and diligence. Why proofread when the machine will do it for you? As long as the gibberish can be found in the spellcheck dictionary, it is not flagged as gibberish. So we all hit “send” and the embarrassment is on its way.

Second, language tech tries to think for you, and very often suggests words which are not the idea you’re trying to express, but were* the choice of 99.9% of all other writers before you. So not only does it herd you into being sub-optimum, it herds you into, well, the herd.

My third peeve with technologized writing is that it is American. This only makes sense, because that’s where the profits are made. But Americanized text management has two deficits, at least. First, it is driving us all to spell and construct in an American fashion, robbing us of our local colour. Colour with a “u”.

But perhaps more important is that American English is the Big Vanilla, a Goldilocks version of our language– not too hot, not too cold, just the right temperature for mass consumption. Certainly America has its fair share, and more, of brilliant writers, but mainstream American English prefers bland, thru and thru. And spellcheck is written in and for American English.

So, yes, spellcheck, predictive texting, and all their relatives are helpful servants, but don’t let them get uppity.

*For example, spellcheck flagged “were” and suggested I meant to say “we’re”. What a fool I would have looked if I had accepted that suggestion. On the other hand, that linguistic abomination “thru” passed with flying colours. Or colors, as the case may be.

Please help! I’m looking to double the readership numbers, which means that if every reader successfully invites one friend, we’re done! Just send them a quick note including this link (https://us12.campaign-archive.com/home/?u=c5b0c09025ad045bf11bb02f5&id=b5efdf9247) . I’d be most grateful.

Similar Posts

  • Second Time Around

    “Second time’s a charm”, the saying goes, and there is some truth to it. Left unsaid, of course, is that the first time probably didn’t work, so against that background, a second kick at the can has to have better odds. Certainly in the professional world we see those coming in from an earlier career…

  • Close

    Our English language may not be the craziest in the world, but it must surely be in the running. Take, for example, the word “close”. If you mean “to shut”, as in “close the door”, the word rhymes with “those”. But if you mean “nearly”, as in “close to home”, the word rhymes with “dose”….

  • No Loose Ends

    Like all self-respecting couples in their seventies, Karen and I have had “the discussion”. In fact, we’ve even “made plans”. And while you may not be anywhere near us in age, you too should have plans. About “you know what”. While I may not be as nuts-and-bolts about death as a funeral director, my history…