Why Spellcheck is the Enemy of Good Prose

Don’t get me wrong– spellcheck and predictive texting are wonderful inventions and save us all a ton of work. But just as fire can be your best friend, fire and spellcheck can destroy you if you don’t keep them under control.

There are, I think, at least three reasons why “language tech” is treacherous. First, it lures us into turning off our own common sense and diligence. Why proofread when the machine will do it for you? As long as the gibberish can be found in the spellcheck dictionary, it is not flagged as gibberish. So we all hit “send” and the embarrassment is on its way.

Second, language tech tries to think for you, and very often suggests words which are not the idea you’re trying to express, but were* the choice of 99.9% of all other writers before you. So not only does it herd you into being sub-optimum, it herds you into, well, the herd.

My third peeve with technologized writing is that it is American. This only makes sense, because that’s where the profits are made. But Americanized text management has two deficits, at least. First, it is driving us all to spell and construct in an American fashion, robbing us of our local colour. Colour with a “u”.

But perhaps more important is that American English is the Big Vanilla, a Goldilocks version of our language– not too hot, not too cold, just the right temperature for mass consumption. Certainly America has its fair share, and more, of brilliant writers, but mainstream American English prefers bland, thru and thru. And spellcheck is written in and for American English.

So, yes, spellcheck, predictive texting, and all their relatives are helpful servants, but don’t let them get uppity.

*For example, spellcheck flagged “were” and suggested I meant to say “we’re”. What a fool I would have looked if I had accepted that suggestion. On the other hand, that linguistic abomination “thru” passed with flying colours. Or colors, as the case may be.

Please help! I’m looking to double the readership numbers, which means that if every reader successfully invites one friend, we’re done! Just send them a quick note including this link (https://us12.campaign-archive.com/home/?u=c5b0c09025ad045bf11bb02f5&id=b5efdf9247) . I’d be most grateful.

Similar Posts

  • On Central Banks

    For most of us, the central bank is much like the sun – we know it’s there and understand that it mostly does us good, but otherwise know little about it. Now if some alien power came along and began tinkering with our sun, changing the amount or quality of radiation it produces, we’d all…

  • Tea Leaves

    Last week we looked at constitutional interpretation. Today we look at tea leaf interpretation in general. Not as popular as it used to be, tea leaf reading was a hit at country fairs and amongst those who were into crystal balls, ouija boards, and the like. The idea was to make a cup of tea…

  • Upside Down

    Two things caught my attention this week past. First, Mondrian’s “painting” New York City I has been hanging upside down for over seventy-five years, and nobody noticed until now. And the second, not unrelated, is the CUPE strike in Ontario. To be fair to Mondrian and the critics, the “painting” is actually just a whole…