Killing Kids

Bynormbowley

I know not all my friends will like my saying this, but the evidence seems pretty clear that American munitions killed 168 schoolgirls and their 14 teachers in a strike in Minab, Iran, February 28, 2026. Donald Trump admits to hitting the neighbouring naval base, but maintains that destroying the school was Iran’s own work, notwithstanding the fact it was effected by a Tomahawk missile, none of which Iran has ever possessed. If you were a jury, I’d rest my case at this point.

But in thinking about the immorality of all this, we need to ask: “Is killing kids something new for America?”

Sadly, not. Just not all in one school. Funded and cheered on by gun interests, American governments have stood limply on the sidelines, wringing their hands and offering up “thoughts and prayers” while roughly 493 students and teachers have been gunned down since Columbine, April 20, 1999.

Without getting too deeply into the weeds about the actual meaning of “the right to bear arms” in the US Constitution, it’s hard to believe that the Founders had any inkling that their desire to ensure citizens were not disarmed by a tyrant might result in kids taking assault rifles and handguns to school and blowing away their classmates. Jefferson and Madison would be horrified to walk through a bloodied classroom and hear it suggested that they had provided cover for the slaughter. It was not their intention to banalize weapons of war.

We’re warned in Scriptures (ours and most others) that our consciences can be insulted often enough that we become uncaring and unconcerned about others, shrugging our shoulders at horrendous crimes even against children.

The words of Pastor Martin Niemöller should never be far from our minds in these days:

First they came for the Communists
And I did not speak out
Because I was not a Communist
Then they came for the Socialists
And I did not speak out
Because I was not a Socialist
Then they came for the trade unionists
And I did not speak out
Because I was not a trade unionist
Then they came for the Jews
And I did not speak out
Because I was not a Jew
Then they came for me
And there was no one left
To speak out for me.*

If we can’t speak up for the children, who will be left to speak for us?

*Pastor Martin Niemöller, c. 1946

Similar Posts

  • Take Off, Eh?

    Bynormbowley

    The English language has an unusual construction shared by few others. Even those related languages such as Dutch and German, which have a similar construction, make far less use of it. We call the structure a “phrasal verb”. Phrasal verbs are, as you might imagine, phrases, or groups of words, which behave like a single…

  • Norm’s Corollary

    Bynormbowley

    Laurence Peter was a Canadian educator and hierarchiologist (whatever that may be), famous for the Peter Principle: “In a hierarchy every employee tends to rise to his level of incompetence… [I]n time every post tends to be occupied by an employee who is incompetent to carry out its duties… Work is accomplished by those employees…

  • Sic Semper Tyrannis

    Bynormbowley

    We’ve always had tyrants, and we always will. Tyrants, after all, are simply extremely successful entrepreneurs who have co-opted their systems to obtain control over most or all of the available human and economic resources. And having done that, “much wants more”, so before long they will wage war, at someone else’s expense, to get…