Reigned In

If I read one more pontification about the need to “reign in” the US Supreme Court or some other out of line demagogues, I’m going to jump off a cliff. No parachute.

Not that I disagree with what they’re trying to say, but because they’re relying on spellcheck instead of proofreading. Kings and queens reign, that is, they rule. Horses have reins, which their riders use to guide them, and when the horses get out of line, to “rein them in”.

To pair things is to take two similar or identical things and put them together as a “pair”. To pare something is to peel it or carve it down to a smaller size. But to “pair someone down to size” just makes no sense, does it?

Homing and honing are a dicey and misunderstood pairing (not paring). In the usage in question, homing is what pigeons do, and missiles or bullets are said to “home in” on a target. Honing is to finish the sharp edge of a blade. Because the notions are not dissimilar, that is, approaching a more precise edge or point, the two expressions “homing in” and “honing in” are often used interchangeably, but incorrectly. It’s “homing in”.

Throws and throes. This one is spellcheck at its most devious. But when something is dying in agony, it’s in its “death throes”, unless the unlucky creature is being tossed around until it expires.

My personal Achilles’ heel is “its” and “it’s”. This is because to keep the rule you must break the rule. In the entirety of the English language, “apostrophe-s” indicates possession, so naturally if something belongs to “it”, you’d spell it “it’s”, right? No, this is (I’m quite sure) the only exception, and “it’s” is reserved for the contractions of it is or it has. It’s about its spelling.

Surprisingly, one sees educated people confusing “lose” and “loose”, as in “I’m going to loose my mind.” Well, yes, if I see that one more time, I probably will turn my mind loose to graze where it wants.

Related, but not one of a pair, is the misuse of “enthralled”. People will tell you that they are enthralled as if it’s a good thing, related to thrilled. Anything but. Historically, “thralls” were domestic slaves. To be enthralled actually means that you are under the control of something, or enslaved by it. At best it means “captivated”.

If someone gets too excited (or is that two exited?) about these things, just tell them, “Dear deer! They’re, their, there, you’ll be grate.”

Crazy language, what?

Similar Posts

  • An Unmarked Grave

    We are at the early stages of discovering how many unmarked graves are associated with native residential schools in Canada, but there will be thousands. And while some may try to argue that those who ran the schools “meant well”, there is no possible excuse for the anonymous burial of thousands of children, or the…

  • Two Leaders, Two Books

    I’m currently working through Mark Carney’s book Value(s), and I’ll confess it’s a tough read. Takes me back to postgrad economics classes, almost that kind of textbook reading. Interesting and valid, but not Tom Clancy, either. You really have to read, stop, contemplate, then move forward. Carney lays a careful bedrock of the history of…

  • Trump the Martyr

    Trump. We’re not done with this reprobate yet. Nor his evil brood. For the foreseeable future, Donald Trump will remain the cult leader of about one in five Americans, and as such will retain enormous influence and power. The Trump Royal Family will appear on talk shows, write books, keynote “freedom rallies”, highlight county fairs,…

  • On Outrage

    It seems that everyone is outraged these days. Everybody is upset about something, everyone’s feelings seem to be deeply hurt. So, just a few thoughts on outrage, partly as a communication issue and partly as a personal growth piece. But, first a bit of trivia, a juicy tidbit you can pull out the next time…